Difference between revisions of "ISMM 2010"

Revision as of 23:09, 30 January 2012

Perfect answer! That ralely gets to the heart of it!

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Event
+Perfect answer! That ralely gets to the heart of it!
-|Acronym=ISMM 2010
-|Title=International Symposium on Memory Management 2010
-|Series=ISMM
-|Type=Conference
-|Field=Programming languages
-|Start date=2010/06/05
-|End date=2010/07/06
-|Homepage=www.cs.purdue.edu/ISMM10/
-|City=Toronto
-|State=Ontario
-|Country=Canada
-|Abstract deadline=2010/02/03
-|Paper deadline=2010/02/09
-|Notification=2010/03/19
-|Camera ready=2010/04/02
-}}
-International Symposium on Memory Management 2010
-Toronto, June 5-6, 2010
-http://www.cs.purdue.edu/ISMM10/
-== CALL FOR PAPERS ==
-ISMM is a forum for research in memory management. Areas of interest include
-but are not limited to:
-* Memory allocation and deallocation
-* Garbage collection algorithms and implementations
-* Compiler analyses and tools to aid memory management
-* Empirical analysis of heap intensive programs
-* Formal analysis and verification of heap intensive programs
-* Memory system design and analysis
-* Verification of memory management algorithms
-* Development and evaluation of open source implementations
-ISMM solicits full-length submissions covering new work on these topics, as
-well as papers presenting confirmations or refutations of important prior
-results. Surveys and comparative analyses that shed new light on previously
-published techniques are also welcome.
-== ORGANIZERS ==
-General Chair: Jan Vitek, Purdue University
-Program Chair: Doug Lea, State University of New York at Oswego
-Program Committee:
-* [[has PC member::Hans Boehm]], HP Labs
-* [[has PC member::Cliff Click]], Azul Systems
-* [[has PC member::David Detlefs]], Microsoft Research
-* [[has PC member::Dave Dice]], Sun Microsystems
-* [[has PC member::Christine Flood]], Sun Microsystems
-* [[has PC member::Daniel Frampton]], Australian National University
-* [[has PC member::Samir Genaim]], Complutense University of Madrid
-* [[has PC member::Richard Jones]], University of Kent
-* [[has PC member::Simon Marlow]], Microsoft Research
-* [[has PC member::Nick Mitchell]], IBM T.J. Watson Research
-* [[has PC member::Filip Pizlo]], Purdue University
-* [[has PC member::Martin Vechev]], IBM T.J. Watson Research
-* [[has PC member::Adam Welc]], Intel
-== KEY DATES ==
-Abstracts due: February 3, 2010
-Submissions due: February 9, 2010
-Author response: March 9-11, 2010
-Notification: March 19, 2010
-Final copy: April 2, 2010
-Conference: June 5-6, 2010
-== SUBMISSIONS ==
-Submitted papers must be in English and formatted to print on US Letter (8.5 x
-inches) paper. Submissions must contain an abstract and postal and electronic
-mailing addresses for at least one contact author. All papers must be submitted
-on-line, preferably in Portable Document Format (PDF), although the submission
-system will also accept PostScript. Submissions should be no more than 10 pages
-(including bibliography, excluding well marked appendices) in standard ACM
-SIGPLAN conference format: two columns, nine-point font (or larger) on a
-ten-point baseline (or larger), with columns 20pc (3.33in) wide and 54pc (9in)
-tall, and a column gutter of 2pc (0.33in). Detailed formatting guidelines along
-with formatting templates or style files for LaTeX are available at
-http://www.acm.org/sigs/sigplan/authorInformation.htm. Papers that violate these
-guidelines will be rejected by the program chair. Program committee members are
-not required to read appendices, and so a paper should be intelligible without
-them. All accepted papers will appear in the published proceedings.
-=== Double-blind reviewing ===
-Authors are anonymous to the reviewers, just as reviewers are anonymous to the
-authors. Authors must take reasonable efforts not to disclose their identities
-to reviewers: Do not give your names nor mention your institution, research
-group or project name. Where necessary for flow, a stand-in name such as "XYZ",
-may be used, with a footnote explaining that the actual name is withheld.
-Discuss your own prior work in the third person, as you would other related
-work. You may also provide reviewers with anonymous auxiliary material such as
-proofs and source code via the PC Chair (see below). Reviewers, for their part,
-will be honor-bound not to try to discover authors' identities until their
-initial reviews are complete. Authors' identities will be revealed at a later
-point in the program committee's deliberations, but will be known only to the
-program chair until that point.
-=== Review committee ===
-ISMM uses a separate Review Committee (RC) as part of the reviewing process. The
-RC complements the Program Committee (PC) by providing expert reviews. The same
-reviewing standards apply to the RC as for the PC. However, RC members review
-only a few papers each, and do not participate in the PC meeting. The use of the
-RC increases the breadth and depth of the reviewer pool.
-=== Rebuttal ===
-The rebuttal process will occur in early March 2010, and will give the authors
-opportunity to respond succinctly to factual errors in reviews, before the
-program committee meets to make its decisions. The committee may, but need not,
-respond to rebuttals or revise reviews at or after the committee meeting.
-=== Auxiliary Material ===
-Authors may provide the PC Chair with a URL for upload of auxiliary material.
-The URL itself will not be seen by reviewers. The authors may reference such
-material in their paper, noting that the material has been made available to the
-PC Chair. This facility may be used by authors to provide reviewers with useful
-information beyond the scope of the submitted paper, such as technical reports,
-proofs, and source code, without disclosing the authors' identity. Authors are
-obliged to make reasonable efforts to make all auxiliary material suitably
-anonymous. Authors are reminded that reviewers are under no obligation to read
-any auxiliary material.
-Papers accompanied by or based on open-source implementations are especially
-welcome. However, if the authors are primary contributors to such a project,
-they should provide source URLs separately to the Program Chair for validation,
-and not list them in the submission proper.
-Got it! Thanks a lot again for heplnig me out!

Difference between revisions of "ISMM 2010"

Revision as of 23:09, 30 January 2012

Navigation menu

Search