Difference between revisions of "CSCW 2006"
(modified through wikirestore by Th) |
(modified through wikirestore by orapi) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Event | {{Event | ||
+ | |Acronym=CSCW 2006 | ||
+ | |Title=2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work | ||
+ | |Series=CSCW | ||
+ | |Type=Conference | ||
+ | |Start date=2006/11/04 | ||
+ | |End date=2006/11/08 | ||
+ | |Homepage=http://www.cscw2006.org/index.html | ||
+ | |City=Banff | ||
+ | |State=Alberta | ||
+ | |Country=Canada | ||
|Submitting link=http://precisionconference.com/~sigchi/ | |Submitting link=http://precisionconference.com/~sigchi/ | ||
|Has coordinator=Shannon Goodman | |Has coordinator=Shannon Goodman | ||
Line 8: | Line 18: | ||
|has tutorial chair=Jonathan Grudin, Steve Poltrock | |has tutorial chair=Jonathan Grudin, Steve Poltrock | ||
|has demo chair=Cory Sanoy, Ehud Sharlin | |has demo chair=Cory Sanoy, Ehud Sharlin | ||
+ | |Submitted papers=304 | ||
+ | |Accepted papers=62 | ||
|has Proceedings DOI=https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875 | |has Proceedings DOI=https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875 | ||
|has Proceedings Bibliography=https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/1180875 | |has Proceedings Bibliography=https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/1180875 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
The ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2006 | The ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2006 |
Revision as of 16:34, 3 November 2021
Event Rating
median | worst |
---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
List of all ratings can be found at CSCW 2006/rating
CSCW 2006 | |
---|---|
2006 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
| |
Event in series | CSCW |
Dates | 2006/11/04 (iCal) - 2006/11/08 |
Homepage: | http://www.cscw2006.org/index.html |
Submitting link: | http://precisionconference.com/~sigchi/ |
Location | |
Location: | Banff, Alberta, Canada |
Papers: | Submitted 304 / Accepted 62 (20.4 %) |
Committees | |
Organizers: | Shannon Goodman |
General chairs: | Pamela Hinds, David Martin |
PC chairs: | Saul Greenberg, Gloria Mark |
Workshop chairs: | Lyn Bartram, Bo Begole |
Panel Chair: | Genevieve Bell, Paul Dourish |
Seminars Chair: | Jonathan Grudin, Steve Poltrock |
Demo chairs: | Cory Sanoy, Ehud Sharlin |
Table of Contents | |
The ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 2006
Topics
- Innovations and experiences with Intranets, the Internet, WWW
- Innovative installations: CSCW and the arts
- Innovative technologies and architectures to support group activity, awareness and telepresence
- Social and organizational effects of introducing technologies
- Theoretical aspects of coordination and communication
- Methodologies and tools for design and analysis of collaborative practices
- Ethnographic and case studies of work practice
- Working with and through collections of heterogeneous technologies
- Emerging issues for global systems
- Studies exploring the appropriate balance between individual and collaborative work.
- Systems for emergency preparedness and large-scale rapid deployment (e.g. disaster relief)
- Reflections on the last 20 years and future directions for CSCW
Submissions
All submissions that will appear in the proceedings must be formatted according to the ACM SIG Proceedings Template. Note: This template is different from the ACM SIGCHI template.
An important aspect of preparing your paper is to provide the proper indexing and retrieval information from the ACM Computing Classification System. Please choose your category and descriptor terms carefully. These will be used to classify your submission in the ACM Digital Library. For help on choosing appropriate terms, visit http://www.acm.org/class/how_to_use.html.
Note that Papers, Notes, and Interactive Posters use a blind review process: the submitted copy should have all authors' names and affiliations blanked out, and should avoid any obvious identifying features. While authors should leave citations to their own relevant work unanonymized, they should reference it in a way that doesn't readily identify them as the authors. For example use "Prior work by [ref]" instead of "In our prior work." Demos, Panels, Tutorials,Videos, Workshops, and the Doctoral Colloquium are not blind reviewed.
Check back here for instructions about acceptable file formats and final submission formatting.