Difference between revisions of "L@S 2017"
(modified through wikirestore by orapi) |
(modified through wikirestore by orapi) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Event | {{Event | ||
+ | |Field=moocs, educational data mining, data mining, learning analytics | ||
+ | |Submission deadline=2016/10/25 | ||
+ | |Notification=2016/12/14 | ||
+ | |has Proceedings Link=https://dl.acm.org/doi/proceedings/10.1145/3051457 | ||
|Acronym=L@S 2017 | |Acronym=L@S 2017 | ||
− | | | + | |End date=2017-04-21 |
|Series=L@S | |Series=L@S | ||
− | |Type=Conference | + | |Type =Conference |
− | | | + | |Country=US |
− | | | + | |State=US/MA |
− | | | + | |City =US/MA/Cambridge |
− | | | + | |Year =2017 |
|Homepage=learningatscale.acm.org/las2017/ | |Homepage=learningatscale.acm.org/las2017/ | ||
− | | | + | |Start date=2017-04-20 |
− | | | + | |Title=L@S 2017 : L@S 2017: Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale |
− | | | + | |Accepted papers=14 |
− | |||
|Submitted papers=105 | |Submitted papers=105 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
}} | }} | ||
All papers were | All papers were |
Latest revision as of 02:20, 6 December 2021
Event Rating
median | worst |
---|---|
List of all ratings can be found at L@S 2017/rating
L@S 2017 | |
---|---|
L@S 2017 : L@S 2017: Fourth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
| |
Event in series | L@S |
Dates | 2017-04-20 (iCal) - 2017-04-21 |
Homepage: | learningatscale.acm.org/las2017/ |
Location | |
Location: | US/MA/Cambridge, US/MA, US |
Important dates | |
Submissions: | 2016/10/25 |
Notification: | 2016/12/14 |
Papers: | Submitted 105 / Accepted 14 (13.3 %) |
Table of Contents | |
All papers were reviewed according to stringent criteria. Full Papers were reviewed by at least three program committee members, Work-In-Progress Papers and Demonstration Descriptions by two. Final decisions for acceptance of Full Papers were made by the program committee as a whole, often after extensive discussion of the merits of the paper. Whereas Full Papers present work that is innovative and mature, WiPs and Demos offer a forum for the newest and emerging work at earlier stages, offering pointers to future directions. As may be clear from the following analytics, the conference is highly selective in the work it accepts. Full Papers: submitted 105, accepted 14 Work in Process & Demos: submitted 79 accepted 35 Accepted as Posters 17 Acceptance Rate 13% 44%