Accessing and Documenting Relational Databases through OWL Ontologies
| Accessing and Documenting Relational Databases through OWL Ontologies | |
|---|---|
Accessing and Documenting Relational Databases through OWL Ontologies
| |
| Bibliographical Metadata | |
| Year: | 2009 |
| Authors: | Carlo Curino, Giorgio Orsi, Emanuele Panigati, Letizia Tanca |
| Venue | FQAS |
| Content Metadata | |
| Problem: | Transforming Relational Databases into Semantic Web |
| Approach: | No data available now. |
| Implementation: | ROSEX-SPARREW |
| Evaluation: | No data available now. |
Abstract
Relational databases have been designed to store high volumes of data and to provide an efficient query interface. Ontologies are geared towards capturing domain knowledge, annotations, and to offer high-level, machine-processable views of data and metadata. The complementary strengths and weaknesses of these data models motivate the research effort we present in this paper. The goal of this work is to bridge the relational and ontological worlds, in order to leverage the efficiency and scalability of relational technologies and the high-level view of data and metadata proper of ontologies. The system we designed and developed achieves: (i) automatic ontology extraction from relational data sources and (ii) automatic query translation from SPARQL to SQL. Among the others, we focus on two main applications of this novel technology: (i) ontological publishing of relational data, and (ii) automatic relational schema annotation and documentation. The system has been designed and tested against real-life scenarios from Big Science projects, which are used as running examples throughout the paper.
Conclusion
In this paper, we presented a completely automated approach to map relational databases and ontologies. The system proposed is capable of extracting an ontological view of the relational schema, and to enable SPARQL access to the relational data source by means of a query rewriting mechanism. The same approach can be used to efficiently store relational ontologies on a RDBMS; moreover, the mapping we devised is completely based on OWL with no need to resort to a new formalism. The impact of this system has been discussed considering three main applications: (i) publishing of relational data in an ontological format, (ii) documentation of relational schemas by means of ontological annotations, and (iii) efficient relational storage for data-intensive ontologies.
Future work
No data available now.
Approach
Positive Aspects: No data available now.
Negative Aspects: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Challenges: No data available now.
Proposes Algorithm: No data available now.
Methodology: No data available now.
Requirements: No data available now.
Limitations: No data available now.
Implementations
Download-page: No data available now.
Access API: No data available now.
Information Representation: No data available now.
Data Catalogue: {{{Catalogue}}}
Runs on OS: No data available now.
Vendor: No data available now.
Uses Framework: No data available now.
Has Documentation URL: No data available now.
Programming Language: No data available now.
Version: No data available now.
Platform: No data available now.
Toolbox: No data available now.
GUI: No
Research Problem
Subproblem of: No data available now.
RelatedProblem: No data available now.
Motivation: No data available now.
Evaluation
Experiment Setup: No data available now.
Evaluation Method : No data available now.
Hypothesis: No data available now.
Description: No data available now.
Dimensions: No data available now.
Benchmark used: No data available now.
Results: No data available now.